9

(557) Competitive Auctions: I Want to Bid Doubles

(557) Competitive Auctions: I Want to Bid Doubles

There are certain auctions where we have made a bid that has “fully described our hand” and we leave the bidding up to partner.  In auctions like these, for example when we have opened the bidding with a preempt at the 2-level or 3-level, then we usually are not very sure of what partner has for their bid and we want to leave any further decisions up to them.  But sometimes we have more shape than partner expects or our instincts tell us that is right to bid on.  When that is the case we do NOT want to just take over and bid again – we told partner we would not bid anymore after our first bid.  In an auction like this we can use a Double as a conventional bid saying “I want to bid more”.  This is called an I Want to bid Double and it applies in very specific situations

(552) Competitive Auctions: More Bidding over 3-Level Preempts

(552) Competitive Auctions: More Bidding over 3-Level Preempts

When the opponents open the bidding with a 3-level preempt then much of the tension in our decision-making process comes around “Should we bid beyond 3NT?” This is especially true when the opponents open the bidding with a 3-Major preempt. Because when we have one long minor suit then we likely want to play in 3NT or 5-minor. This allows us to use 4-minor in some interesting conventional ways, just as we do vs. a 2-level preempt.

(549) NT Bidding: Slam Tries After Stayman

(549) NT Bidding: Slam Tries After Stayman

One of the most common gadgets that we use when partner opens 1NT is Stayman. We primarily use Stayman to search for a 4-4 Major suit fit. After Stayman sometimes we want to have a way to raise partner’s suit where they cannot pass. We will want a “Forcing Raise” (similar to Jacoby 2NT or Inverted Minors) in order to find out more about Opener’s hand. This is missing from a standard bidding system. It is a valuable tool for making a slam try while keeping the auction from getting too high.

(548) NT Bidding: Modern, Transfer, and Modern Transfer Lebensohl

(548) NT Bidding: Modern, Transfer, and Modern Transfer Lebensohl

Lebensohl is an excellent system for dealing with interference over our 1NT opening bids. But Lebensohl has some flaws. In Lebensohl auctions we will often play the hand from the “wrong” side (Responder’s side.) Another flaw in Lebensohl relates to Responder’s strength. Responder often has three strengths (buckets) let’s see how Transfer Lebensohl is an upgrade to this.

(547) NT Bidding: Responding after a Penalty Double of a 1NT Opening

(547) NT Bidding: Responding after a Penalty Double of a 1NT Opening

When we open the bidding with 1NT, showing 15-17 points, if an opponent makes a penalty double, we are less likely to be looking to invite or bid game. We are usually looking to escape from a 1NT contract and attempt to find some safer place to play. This safe place will hopefully be our largest fit or a long suit in the weak hand (in Responder’s hand). In order to find this place to play we need to look at how Responder’s bidding options change after a penalty double.

(539) Slam Bidding: Non-Serious 3NT

(539) Slam Bidding: Non-Serious 3NT

When we find a Major suit fit at the 3-level in a game forcing auction, then partner is usually expressing interest in slam (because without slam interest, partner would have applied the Principle of Fast Arrival and bid 4M.) In this case, now we usually express whether we have slam interest or not by either making a cuebid or simply bidding game with 4M. A partnership can use a gadget called “Non-Serious 3NT” to gain even further clarification about a player’s level of slam interest.

(470) Unusual vs. Unusual and Unusual vs. Michaels

(470)  Unusual vs. Unusual and Unusual vs. Michaels

Here we look at times when we have to deal with the opponents 2-suited attacking bids -- Michaels Cuebids and Unusual NT.  Here we look at some special agreements, Unusual vs Unusual and Unusual vs Michaels, to help us compete in the bidding.